Reading Time: 10 minutes
Target Audience: Executives, decision-makers, governance leaders
Key Takeaway: Spec-first governance delivers compliance at the speed of development.
SEA™ Forge’s spec-first architecture enables transformative governance:
Organizations face critical risks:
| Risk | Impact | SEA™ Forge Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory penalties | Up to €35M or 7% global revenue (EU AI Act) | Spec-based compliance with Evidence Service |
| Architecture drift | Documentation lies; systems diverge | Drift detection blocks deployment |
| AI output harm | Hallucinations, bias, privacy breaches | Policy Gateway filters all LLM outputs |
| Audit failure | Months of preparation, uncertain outcomes | Tamper-evident audit trails (SDS-043) |
Traditional governance creates friction. SEA™ Forge governance accelerates by making safety a real-time signal embedded in the development pipeline.
SEA™ Forge synthesizes multiple governance frameworks into executable specifications:
| Framework | SEA™ Forge Implementation |
|---|---|
| NIST AI RMF | GovernedSpeed™: Policy Gateway (SDS-042) + Evidence Service (SDS-043) |
| ISO 42001 | SEA™ Invariants (SDS-035): 15 non-negotiable system controls |
| EU AI Act | Risk classification via SEA™ DSL policy annotations |
| CPMAI+E | Spec-First Pipeline: ADR→PRD→SDS→SEA™ Model→Code |
just spec-guard validates every change against policiesObjective: Establish governance structure aligned with SEA™ Forge
Key Activities:
just doctor to validate environmentDeliverables: Working governance stack, initial policy set
Investment: 20-40 engineering hours
Objective: Create comprehensive governance policies in SEA™ DSL
Key Activities:
Deliverables: SEA™ DSL policy library, Gateway configuration
Investment: 40-60 engineering hours
Objective: Embed governance into spec-to-code pipeline
Key Activities:
spec-guard in CI/CDDeliverables: Governed delivery pipeline, audit trail infrastructure
Investment: 30-50 engineering hours
Objective: Maintain and evolve governance with business needs
Key Activities:
Deliverables: Governance metrics dashboard, compliance reports
Investment: 10-20 hours/month ongoing
Avoided Costs:
| Metric | Before | After | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation accuracy | ~50% | 100% (generated) | Immediate |
| Deployment cycle time | Weeks | Continuous | 40% reduction |
| Compliance preparation | 2-4 weeks/audit | Always ready | 90% reduction |
| Architecture reviews | Manual, periodic | Automated, continuous | Real-time |
✅ Requirement: C-suite champion who understands spec-first value
❌ Risk if missing: Governance bypassed for “speed”
✅ Requirement: Teams commit to updating specs before code
❌ Risk if missing: Drift accumulates; governance becomes theater
✅ Requirement: GovernedSpeed™, Policy Gateway, Evidence Service deployed
❌ Risk if missing: Manual processes don’t scale
✅ Requirement: Regular training on SEA™ DSL and workflows
❌ Risk if missing: Teams revert to ungoverned patterns
YES, if you answer “yes” to 3+ questions:
just doctor to validate environment readinessAI governance is essential—but it doesn’t have to slow you down.
SEA™ Forge’s spec-first architecture transforms governance from a compliance burden into a competitive advantage. Policies become code. Compliance becomes continuous. Documentation stays accurate.
The cost of governance is predictable and manageable.
The cost of governance failure is catastrophic and unpredictable.
Ready to begin? Start with the Quick Start Guide for a practical 30-day launch plan.
Last Updated: January 2026
For Questions: Contact AI Governance Committee lead