⭐ Power Features

Advanced workflows that showcase the full power of SEA-Forge™.

🚀 Compound Workflows

These workflows combine multiple SEA™ capabilities for maximum impact.

1. Spec-to-Deployment Pipeline

Complete end-to-end from specification to running code:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

You: Execute full pipeline for case-management:
1. Validate spec
2. Generate code
3. Run tests  
4. Show observability trace

SEA™: Executing Spec-to-Deployment Pipeline...

Step 1/4: Validation
✅ docs/specs/case-management/case-management.sea
   12 entities, 8 flows, 5 policies validated

Step 2/4: Code Generation  
✅ Generated 18 files in libs/case-management/

Step 3/4: Test Execution
✅ 42 tests passed (domain: 28, ports: 14)
⚠️ 2 tests skipped (integration, needs DB)

Step 4/4: Observability
Trace ID: trace-abc123
View: http://localhost:5080/traces/trace-abc123

Pipeline completed in 45s

2. Semantic Impact Analysis

Before making changes, understand the blast radius:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

You: What would happen if I rename Entity "Case" to "Matter"?

SEA™: Semantic Impact Analysis:

Direct Impact:
├── 12 references in case-management.sea
├── 8 generated files need regeneration
└── 3 downstream specs reference "Case"

Downstream Cascade:
├── workbench-ui (SDS-054): 2 API endpoints
├── agent-society (SDS-040): 1 agent config
└── knowledge-graph: 45 RDF triples

Policy Impact:
├── POL-CASE-001: Rule text references "Case"
└── SDS-016: Semantic debt would be created

Recommendation:
Add alias: Entity "Matter" aliases "Case"
This preserves backward compatibility.

Proceed with rename? [Yes/Aliased rename/Cancel]

3. Cross-Context Query

Query relationships across bounded contexts:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

You: Find all agents that can modify case-management entities, 
with their authority levels and sponsors

SEA™: Cross-Context Agent Query:

```sparql
SELECT ?agent ?role ?sponsor ?entity ?action WHERE {
  ?agent a sea:Agent ;
         sea:role ?role ;
         sea:sponsor ?sponsor ;
         sea:capability ?cap .
  ?cap sea:action ?action ;
       sea:target ?entity .
  ?entity sea:domain "case-management" .
  FILTER(?action IN ("create", "update", "delete"))
}

Results: | Agent | Role | Sponsor | Entity | Action | |——-|——|———|——–|——–| | case-manager | R-AA | R-DS:pm-lead | Case | create, update | | task-executor | R-AA | R-DS:dev-lead | Task | update | | stage-transitioner | R-AA | R-DS:pm-lead | Stage | update |

Authority Chain: case-manager → pm-lead → domain-owner → sovereign

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

---

## 🎯 One-Shot Powerups

Quick commands that deliver immediate value.

### Architecture Fitness Check

You: Run CALM boundary validation for all bounded contexts

SEA™: Architecture Fitness Report:

Context Boundaries Violations Status
governance 5 0 ✅
case-management 4 0 ✅
agent-society 3 1 ⚠️
knowledge-graph 2 0 ✅

Violation Detail (agent-society):

Fix: Add interface declaration in SDS-040 §7.2

1
2
3
4
5

---

### Compliance Evidence Bundle

You: Generate SOC2 evidence bundle for governance context

SEA™: Generating Evidence Bundle…

Evidence collected: ├── audit_logs.json (30 days, 4,521 entries) ├── policy_evaluations.json (compliance decisions) ├── agent_authority_matrix.csv (who can do what) ├── change_provenance.json (git commits + spec changes) └── observability_summary.json (SLO metrics)

Bundle: evidence/soc2-governance-2026-01.zip SHA256: abc123…

Vanta upload: Ready (set VANTA_TOKEN to auto-upload)

1
2
3
4
5

---

### Semantic Debt Dashboard

You: Show semantic debt summary across all contexts

SEA™: Semantic Debt Dashboard:

Total Debt Score: 127 points (Medium)

By Context: | Context | Debt Score | Top Issue | |———|————|———–| | agent-society | 45 | Missing invariant tests | | case-management | 32 | Orphan entities | | governance | 28 | Concept drift | | knowledge-graph | 22 | Stale RDF mappings |

Top 5 Debt Items:

  1. [HIGH] Missing INV tests for POL-031 (15 pts)
  2. [MED] “PolicyConstraint” vs “PolicyRule” naming (12 pts)
  3. [MED] Unused Entity “LegacyCase” (10 pts)
  4. [LOW] Missing flow annotations (8 pts)
  5. [LOW] Incomplete SBVR projections (6 pts)

Quick fix available for #2 and #3. Apply? [Yes/No]

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

---

## 🔧 Developer Experience Enhancements

### Auto-Complete Context

LibreChat remembers your project context:

You: [After previous conversations about case-management]

What’s the status of the Case entity tests?

SEA™: [Recalls context automatically]

Case entity tests (libs/case-management/domain/src/tests/): ✅ case.entity.spec.ts - 14/14 passing ✅ case-status.vo.spec.ts - 8/8 passing
⚠️ case-lifecycle.spec.ts - 6/7 (1 skipped: needs refactor)

The skipped test relates to the Stage transition we discussed adding on Jan 3.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

---

### Smart Suggestions

SEA™ proactively suggests improvements:

You: Validate case-management spec

SEA™: ✅ Validation passed

💡 Suggestions:

  1. Add @cqrs annotation to Flow “AssignTask” (missing)
  2. Policy “StageOrder” could reference SDS-012 for traceability
  3. Consider adding invariant for “completed stages can’t be reopened”

Apply suggestion #3? It would add:

Policy StageImmutability per Constraint Prohibition priority 80
  @rationale "Completed stages cannot be reopened (data integrity)"
as: stage.status = "Completed" implies not stage.canTransitionTo("Active")

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

---

### Integrated Observability

See the impact of your changes in real-time:

You: I just deployed the case-management update. How’s it performing?

SEA™: Real-time Performance (last 5 minutes):

Endpoint: POST /cases ├── Request count: 42 ├── P50 latency: 45ms ├── P99 latency: 180ms ├── Error rate: 0% └── Trace sample: trace-xyz789

Compared to before deployment: ├── Latency: -12% (improvement) └── Errors: No change

OTel Dashboard: http://localhost:5080/dashboards/case-management

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

---

## 🎨 Custom Workflows

Define your own compound workflows:

```yaml
# .sea/workflows/daily-check.yaml
name: Daily Health Check
triggers:
  - schedule: "0 9 * * *"
  - command: "daily-check"

steps:
  - name: Validate All Specs
    action: validate_specs
    args:
      paths: ["docs/specs/**/*.sea"]
      
  - name: Check Semantic Debt
    action: query_knowledge
    args:
      sparql: |
        SELECT (COUNT(?debt) as ?count) WHERE {
          ?debt a sea:SemanticDebt ;
                sea:severity "HIGH" .
        }
        
  - name: Report
    action: chat
    args:
      prompt: "Summarize today's health check results"

Run via:

1
2
3
4

You: Run daily-check workflow

SEA™: Executing Daily Health Check...
[Results from all steps]

🏆 Pro Tips

Tip Example
Chain commands “Validate, then generate, then test”
Ask for diffs “Show what would change if…”
Request evidence “Prove that X satisfies policy Y”
Cross-reference “How does this relate to SDS-048?”
Time-travel “What was the state of X on date Y?”

Last Updated: January 2026