SEA™ Case-Based Project Management Handbook

Purpose & Context

SEA™’s case-based PM adapts CMMN (Case Management Model and Notation) for knowledge-intensive work. Unlike prescriptive workflows (Waterfall/Agile), cases enable discretionary, event-driven orchestration with AI agent support.

Actionable: Each section answers “How do I manage knowledge work?” with CMMN primitives, artifact pipelines, and PM-Agent integration.


1 CMMN Fundamentals

1.1 Core Primitives

Primitive Description SEA™ Mapping Example
Case Container for related work Aggregate Root Research project, consulting engagement
Stage Phase with entry/exit criteria Entity Literature review, analysis, delivery
Task Unit of work (mandatory/discretionary) Entity Write spec, conduct interview, review draft
Sentry Event-driven activation condition Policy “All interviews complete” → Analysis stage
Milestone Completion marker Value Object “Hypothesis validated”, “Client approved”
CaseFile Artifact collection Value Object Notes, specs, deliverables

1.2 Case Lifecycle

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Created → Active → Completed/Terminated
    ↓
  Stages (parallel/sequential)
    ↓
  Tasks (mandatory + discretionary)
    ↓
  Sentries (entry/exit gates)

1.3 Discretionary vs Mandatory

Mandatory Tasks: Must execute (e.g., “Submit final report”)
Discretionary Tasks: Activate based on events (e.g., “Additional research” if hypothesis unclear)


2 Artifact Pipeline

2.1 Four Reification Stages

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    ARTIFACT PIPELINE                            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│  Cognitive Artifacts (notes, sketches)                          │
│         ↓ Synthesis                                             │
│  Intellectual Artifacts (specs, SOPs, concepts)                 │
│         ↓ Refinement                                            │
│  Information Products (software, campaigns, reports)            │
│         ↓ Capitalization                                        │
│  Intellectual Capital (enterprise assets, reusable IP)          │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

2.2 Stage Characteristics

Stage Purpose Examples Retention
Cognitive Reduce mental load Meeting notes, whiteboard photos Ephemeral
Intellectual Synthesize knowledge ADRs, PRDs, SOPs Project lifetime
Product Deliver value Deployed code, client reports Indefinite
Capital Organizational asset Reusable templates, proven methodologies Permanent

2.3 Transition Tokens

Every artifact progression generates a TransitionToken:

Flow "Synthesis" from "CognitiveArtifact" to "IntellectualArtifact"
@rationale "Raw notes become formal specifications"

Provenance Gating: No artifact can skip stages (“teleportation” prevented).


3 PM-Agent Orchestration

3.1 PM-Agent Role

The Project Manager Agent is a built-in AI conductor that:

3.2 Hybrid Teams

Member Type Role Examples
Human Strategic intent, judgment, oversight Principal investigator, creative director
AI (G3) Specialized execution Literature summarizer, code generator
PM-Agent Coordination, orchestration Task assignment, sentry evaluation

3.3 Task Assignment Logic

1
2
3
4
5
1. Identify available tasks (sentries satisfied)
2. Match task requirements to member capabilities
3. Check SDS-031 authority rules
4. Assign to qualified member
5. Log assignment to IFL

4 Case Lifecycle Management

4.1 Case Creation

Steps:

  1. Define desired outcome
  2. Select case template (research, development, consulting, creative)
  3. Identify initial CaseMembers
  4. Configure PM-Agent with Knowledge Base context
  5. Activate initial stage

Example (Research Case):

1
2
3
4
5
Case: "Evaluate ML Framework Performance"
Desired Outcome: "Comparative analysis with recommendations"
Template: research_case_pattern
Initial Stage: Literature Review
PM-Agent Context: ML frameworks, performance metrics

4.2 Stage Progression

Entry Sentry: Condition to activate stage
Exit Sentry: Condition to complete stage

Example:

1
2
3
Stage: Analysis
Entry Sentry: "All data collected AND quality validated"
Exit Sentry: "Findings documented AND peer reviewed"

4.3 Task Activation

Mandatory: Automatically active when stage starts
Discretionary: PM-Agent activates based on events

Example:

1
2
Mandatory: "Conduct statistical analysis"
Discretionary: "Additional data collection" (if initial results inconclusive)

5 Knowledge Work Patterns

5.1 Research Pattern

Stage Tasks Sentries Artifacts
Literature Review Search, summarize, synthesize Entry: Case created Cognitive: Notes
Hypothesis Formation Define, validate Exit: Lit review complete Intellectual: Hypothesis doc
Experiment Design Plan, review Entry: Hypothesis approved Intellectual: Protocol
Execution Run experiments Exit: Design approved Cognitive: Raw data
Analysis Process, interpret Entry: Data collected Product: Analysis report
Synthesis Conclusions, recommendations Exit: Analysis complete Capital: Methodology

5.2 Development Pattern

Stage Tasks Sentries Artifacts
Specification ADR, PRD, SDS Entry: Feature request Intellectual: Specs
Design Architecture, API Exit: Specs approved Intellectual: Design docs
Implementation Code, tests Entry: Design reviewed Product: Working code
Verification Test, validate Exit: Code complete Product: Test results
Deployment Release, monitor Entry: Tests passing Capital: Deployed feature

5.3 Consulting Pattern

Stage Tasks Sentries Artifacts
Discovery Interviews, research Entry: Engagement signed Cognitive: Interview notes
Analysis Synthesize, identify issues Exit: Discovery complete Intellectual: Analysis
Recommendations Solutions, roadmap Entry: Analysis reviewed Product: Presentation
Delivery Present, refine Exit: Recommendations approved Capital: Methodology

6 Provenance and Governance

6.1 TransitionToken Generation

Every state change generates an immutable token:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PlanItemTransitionRecord {
  caseId: "case-123"
  planItemId: "stage-analysis"
  fromState: "Available"
  toState: "Active"
  timestamp: "2026-01-04T21:00:00Z"
  actor: "pm-agent-001"
  transitionToken: "tt-abc123"
}

6.2 IFL Integration

All TransitionTokens logged to Internal Federated Ledger for:

6.3 Governance Policies

Policy "NoTeleportation" per Constraint Obligation priority 10
@rationale "Artifacts require lineage"
as: forall p in resources where p.name = "ProjectionToken":
    exists t in resources where t.name = "TransitionToken"

Policy "SovereignGate" per Constraint Obligation priority 10
@rationale "Capital conversion requires human approval"
as: forall r in flows where r.name = "Capitalization":
    exists s in resources where s.name = "SignatureToken"

7 Implementation Roadmap

Phase 1: CMMN Foundation (Weeks 1-2)

Phase 2: Artifact Pipeline (Weeks 3-4)

Phase 3: PM-Agent Integration (Weeks 5-6)

Phase 4: Scale (Ongoing)


Conclusion

This handbook delivers a unified, actionable case management system that leverages SEA™’s CMMN implementation. By treating knowledge work as discretionary and event-driven, organizations achieve flexible orchestration, artifact capitalization, and AI-augmented project management.


Last Updated: January 2026 Version: 1.0.0