ANALYSIS-002: SEA-Forge™ Knowledge Frontier & Research Agenda

Document Type

Analysis / Research Direction

Purpose

Documents the open questions, critical assumptions requiring validation, research vectors, and learning agenda for the SEA-Forge™ project to guide future exploration and risk mitigation.


Open Question Registry

Human-AI Collaboration Balance

Question: What is the optimal balance between AI-driven recommendations and user autonomy to maximize cognitive amplification without fostering over-reliance or reducing critical thinking?

Context: The Cognitive Extension Layer actively generates and recommends artifacts. Finding the right level of AI intervention is critical.

Research Direction: A/B testing of different autonomy levels; longitudinal studies on user skill development.


Measuring Cognitive Amplification

Question: How can we measure cognitive amplification in a quantifiable and meaningful way that goes beyond traditional productivity metrics?

Context: Standard metrics (task completion time, throughput) may not capture the full value of enhanced decision-making and reduced cognitive load.

Research Direction: Develop composite metrics combining:


Ethical Implications

Question: What are the ethical implications of an AI system that actively guides user attention and intention, and how can we ensure responsible development and deployment?

Context: SEA-Forge™’s cognitive artifacts influence what users focus on and how they approach tasks.

Research Direction:


Semantic Conflict Handling

Question: How can the system gracefully handle semantic conflicts or ambiguities that inevitably arise over time in a dynamic enterprise environment?

Context: Business concepts evolve; definitions may conflict between teams or over time.

Research Direction:


Long-Term Impact on Skills

Question: What are the long-term impacts of pervasive cognitive amplification on human skill development and organizational learning?

Context: Over-reliance on AI assistance could atrophy human skills.

Research Direction:


Assumption Audit

Explicit Assumptions (Stated)

Assumption Validation Approach
Users will find AI-generated cognitive artifacts genuinely helpful User acceptance testing, NPS surveys
A formal Semantic Core is maintainable at enterprise scale Pilot with limited bounded contexts first
CALM can govern a complex, evolving architecture Compliance metrics, drift detection rates

Hidden Assumptions (Unstated but Present)

Assumption Risk if Wrong Validation Approach
Users view AI as cognitive partner, not threat Resistance, low adoption Change management research, user interviews
Benefits outweigh formalization overhead ROI negative Cost-benefit analysis at each phase
AI models can achieve sufficient accuracy Unreliable recommendations Accuracy benchmarks, fallback mechanisms

Critical Assumptions Requiring Validation

Assumption Validation Experiment Success Criteria
Recommendation Algorithm achieves high accuracy A/B testing with real users >80% user acceptance rate
CADSL is sufficiently expressive Prototype 20+ artifact types All common patterns representable
Context Analyzer provides rich, timely context End-to-end latency testing <200ms context enrichment

Dangerous Assumptions to Monitor

Assumption Monitoring Approach
AI recommendations always aligned with best interests Bias audits, outcome tracking
Feedback loop won’t create echo chambers Diversity metrics in recommendations
System won’t reinforce existing organizational biases Fairness analysis, demographic impact studies

Research Vectors

1. Explainable AI (XAI) Integration

Objective: Make recommendation and agent decision processes transparent and understandable.

Approaches:

Expected Outcome: Increased user trust and adoption.


2. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)

Objective: Accelerate refinement of Recommendation Algorithm and AI agent behaviors.

Approaches:

Expected Outcome: Continuously improving recommendation quality.


3. Cognitive Impact Studies

Objective: Understand psychological and sociological effects of cognitively amplified work.

Research Questions:

Approaches:


4. External Knowledge Integration

Objective: Seamlessly integrate external knowledge sources while maintaining semantic consistency.

Challenges:

Approaches:


5. ROI Quantification Methodology

Objective: Develop methodologies for quantifying return on investment in complex enterprise settings.

Metrics to Track:

Approach: Before/after studies with control groups where possible.


Learning Agenda

Skills to Develop

Skill Area Application in SEA-Forge™
Graph-based machine learning Knowledge Graph reasoning
Advanced prompt engineering AI agent configuration
Cognitive psychology Artifact design and UX
DSL design and implementation DomainForge™, CADSL
Ethical AI development Responsible system design

Key Experiments to Conduct

Experiment Purpose
A/B testing of recommendation strategies Optimize algorithm parameters
Cognitive artifact design studies Identify most effective artifact types
Longitudinal usability studies Measure sustained impact
Semantic drift monitoring Validate consistency mechanisms

Experts to Consult

Domain Expertise Needed
Cognitive Science Human attention and memory
AI Ethics Responsible AI deployment
Enterprise Architecture Semantic technology at scale
Business Domains Industry-specific validation

Next Conversations

  1. User Onboarding: How to train users to maximize benefits of cognitive amplification
  2. Framework Evolution: How to adapt SEA-Forge™ to emerging technologies
  3. Ecosystem Governance: How to ensure long-term sustainability of the platform
  4. Community Building: How to foster a community around the DSLs and patterns

Meta-Insights

The ideation process highlighted the power of interdisciplinary synthesis:

Core Insight:

“The future enterprise is not just automated, but truly sentient—a living, learning, and cognitively amplified entity.”