Status: Draft
Version: 1.0
Date: 2025-12-30
Satisfies: PRD-005, ADR-025
Bounded-Context: shared
| Spec Section | SEA-DSL Target | Cardinality | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3. Values | Policy nodes | 1:1 | Boolean expression verbatim |
| 3.1 Fitness Fn | Invariant expression | 1:1 | Equation matches |
| 6.1 Constitution | Entity schema | 1:1 | Field names + types match |
| 6.2 Evaluation | Entity schema | 1:1 | Field names + types match |
| 7. API Contract | Flow @command/@query | 1:1 | Input/output schema identical |
| Term | Definition | Type | Canonical? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Axiological Value | A named priority in the hierarchy (Sovereignty, Structure, etc.) | Value Object | ✓ |
| Fitness Function | Equation computing artifact value score V | Algorithm | ✓ |
| Constitution | The serialized hierarchy of values and weights | Entity | ✓ |
| Value Evaluation | A recorded assessment of an artifact against the fitness function | Entity | ✓ |
| Attention Tier | Classification (Existential, Operational, Noise) for routing | Value Object | ✓ |
| Human Sovereign | The human operator with ultimate control over the system | Role | ✓ |
| Cognitive Range | The enhanced human capacity for understanding and decision-making | Concept | ✓ |
The Axiological Constitution Service is the Soul of the Cognitive Architecture. It defines the Hierarchy of Values that governs the Evolutionary Kernel and constrains the Isomorphic Compiler.
It serves as:
The capacity for the Human Operator to understand and control the system’s outcome is more valuable than the speed at which the system operates.
Constraint: The System SHALL NOT execute a “High-Stakes” action without explicit Human Reification, even if doing so reduces throughput by 99%.
The integrity of the Relationship Graph (Schema) is more valuable than the volume of Text generated.
Constraint: The Compiler MUST reject any “Creative” output that breaks the “Structural” constraints.
The goal is to increase the ratio of Output/Input (Leverage), not to reduce Input to zero (Automation).
Constraint: The System MUST optimize for “Cognitive Range” rather than “Cognitive Offloading.”
1
V = (α × Leverage × β × Coherence) / (γ × Entropy + ε)
| Variable | Definition | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Leverage (L) | Impact magnitude of the artifact | Scale: 1-1000 based on reach |
| Coherence (C) | Isomorphic match between Intention and Artifact | 0.0 - 1.0 similarity score |
| Entropy (E) | Cognitive load required to maintain | Token count / complexity metric |
| α, β, γ | Constitutional weights | Defined in Constitution file |
| ε | Stability constant | 0.001 (prevents division by zero) |
| Mutation Type | L | C | E | V | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bolt-On (Chatbot) | Low (10) | Low (0.3) | High (100) | ~0.03 | ❌ REJECT |
| Architecture (Router) | High (500) | High (0.9) | Low (10) | ~45 | ✅ ACCEPT |
| Tier | Trigger | Allocation | Goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1: Existential | Issues affecting Sovereignty or Structure | Unlimited inference budget | Perfect Reification |
| Tier 2: Operational | Issues affecting Velocity or Content | Standard inference budget | “Good Enough” efficiency |
| Tier 3: Noise | Bolt-on requests | Zero | Silence |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
def route_attention(case: Case, constitution: Constitution) -> Tier:
if case.affects(Values.SOVEREIGNTY) or case.affects(Values.STRUCTURE):
return Tier.EXISTENTIAL
elif case.affects(Values.VELOCITY) or case.affects(Values.CONTENT):
return Tier.OPERATIONAL
else:
return Tier.NOISE # Discard
The Axiological Constitution enshrines rights that the machine cannot cross:
Every output MUST carry a Citation Trace linking it back to a Human Intention or Data Source. The System cannot claim “I thought of this.”
The Human Sovereign retains the absolute right to trigger System-Wide Disintegration (Kill Switch). If the System’s “Values” drift from the Human’s “Values,” the Human may destroy the Schema and force a rebuild.
The System MUST explain why it made a decision in terms of the Hierarchy of Values. “Because the model said so” is unconstitutional.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
constitution:
version: '1.0'
hierarchy:
- name: 'sovereignty'
priority: 1
description: 'Human control and understanding'
- name: 'structure'
priority: 2
description: 'Schema integrity over content volume'
- name: 'leverage'
priority: 3
description: 'Output/Input ratio maximization'
weights:
alpha: 1.0 # Leverage weight
beta: 1.0 # Coherence weight
gamma: 1.0 # Entropy weight
thresholds:
existential_trigger: 0.9
operational_trigger: 0.5
noise_cutoff: 0.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
evaluation:
id: 'eval-uuid'
artifact_id: 'artifact-uuid'
timestamp: '2025-12-22T10:00:00Z'
inputs:
leverage: 500
coherence: 0.85
entropy: 25
weights_applied:
alpha: 1.0
beta: 1.0
gamma: 1.0
result:
value_score: 17.0
tier: 'EXISTENTIAL'
decision: 'ACCEPT'
1
POST /axiological/evaluate
Request:
1
2
3
4
5
6
{
"artifact_id": "uuid",
"leverage_score": 500,
"coherence_score": 0.85,
"entropy_cost": 25
}
Response:
1
2
3
4
5
6
{
"value_score": 17.0,
"tier": "EXISTENTIAL",
"decision": "ACCEPT",
"explanation": "High leverage (500) with strong coherence (0.85) justifies resource allocation despite moderate entropy."
}
1
POST /axiological/route
Request:
1
2
3
4
{
"case_id": "uuid",
"affected_values": ["sovereignty", "structure"]
}
Response:
1
2
3
4
5
{
"tier": "EXISTENTIAL",
"allocation": "UNLIMITED",
"priority": 1
}
| Component | Relationship |
|---|---|
| Evolutionary Kernel | Fitness Function for mutation selection |
| Isomorphic Compiler | Constraint validation before reification |
| Thermodynamic Substrate | Attention budget allocation |
| Semantic Debt Ledger | Value-based debt classification |