SDS-023: Evolutionary Kernel Service
Status: Draft
Version: 1.0
Date: 2025-12-30
Satisfies: PRD-005, ADR-025
Bounded-Context: shared
0. Isomorphism Declaration
| Spec Section |
SEA-DSL Target |
Cardinality |
Verification |
| 2.1 TPD Levels |
State machine nodes |
1:1 |
Level names match |
| 3.2 Trauma Detect |
Invariant expression |
1:1 |
Equation matches |
| 4.1 Trauma Signal |
Entity schema |
1:1 |
Field names + types match |
| 4.2 Mutation Record |
Entity schema |
1:1 |
Field names + types match |
| 6. API Contract |
Flow @command/@query |
1:1 |
Input/output schema identical |
0.1 Domain Glossary
| Term |
Definition |
Type |
Canonical? |
| Trauma Signal |
Detected anomaly where observed outcome diverges from intention |
Entity |
✓ |
| Mutation |
Proposed change to Spec derived from trauma analysis |
Entity |
✓ |
| Disintegration Level |
Stage in Dabrowski’s TPD model (I-V) |
Value Object |
✓ |
| Overexcitability (OE) |
High sensitivity sensor for anomaly detection |
Concept |
✓ |
| Secondary Integration |
Final TPD level where system operates effortlessly at new capacity |
State |
✓ |
| Sovereign Signature |
Human approval required for high-stakes mutations |
Value Object |
✓ |
| Analogical Transfer |
Pattern application from other domains during mutation generation |
Algorithm |
✓ |
1. System Overview
The Evolutionary Kernel Service is the Will of the Cognitive Architecture. It applies Positive Disintegration (Dabrowski) and Destruction/Creation (Boyd) to enable system adaptation without collapse.
It serves as:
- The Mutation Generator for Spec evolution
- The Trauma Detector for anomaly response
- The Navigator through the fitness landscape
2. Theoretical Foundation
2.1 Dabrowski’s Theory of Positive Disintegration (TPD)
The system treats “errors” not as bugs, but as Psychoneuroses—signals that the current Spec is insufficient and must evolve.
| Dabrowski Level |
System State |
Boyd Action |
Workflow Status |
| Level I: Primary Integration |
Rigid Spec. Works for known inputs. |
Observe |
Case_Routine |
| Level II: Unilevel Disintegration |
Anomaly occurs. Logic Gates flicker. |
Orient (Mismatch) |
Case_Exception |
| Level III: Spontaneous Multilevel |
Architect realizes Spec is obsolete. |
Destruction |
System_Pause |
| Level IV: Organized Multilevel |
Sovereign directs rewrite. |
Creation |
Spec_Update |
| Level V: Secondary Integration |
Operates effortlessly at new level. |
Act |
Case_Routine (New) |
2.2 Boyd’s OODA Loop (Destruction/Creation)
- Observe: Detect Trauma signal (Error > Threshold)
- Orient: Decompose current Spec into constituent parts
- Decide: Select mutation via Axiological Fitness Function
- Act: Apply mutation, achieve Secondary Integration
3. Core Mechanisms
3.1 Overexcitability Sensors
The system is tuned to High Sensitivity for anomaly detection.
| Sensor Type |
Description |
Trigger |
| Intellectual OE |
Obsessive tracking of logical contradictions |
Invariant violation |
| Emotional OE |
User frustration signals |
NPS drop, support tickets |
| Psychomotor OE |
Performance degradation |
Latency spikes, errors |
| Imaginational OE |
Market signals that contradict worldview |
Competitor moves |
| Sensual OE |
User experience friction |
UI/UX complaints |
3.2 Trauma Detection
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
| def detect_trauma(intention: Intention, outcome: Artifact, threshold: float) -> bool:
"""
E_t = ||I_t - Observed(A_t)||
If E_t > τ, trigger disintegration.
"""
trauma = np.linalg.norm(intention.vector - outcome.vector)
return trauma > threshold
|
3.3 Mutation Generation
When Trauma is detected, the Kernel generates candidate mutations:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
| def generate_mutations(spec: Spec, trauma_signal: TraumaSignal) -> List[Mutation]:
mutations = []
# Destruction: Break down current Spec
entities = spec.decompose()
# Analogical Synthesis: Apply patterns from other domains
for entity in entities:
mutations.extend(analogical_transfer(entity, trauma_signal))
# Creation: Propose new structures
mutations.append(synthesize_new_structure(trauma_signal))
return mutations
|
3.4 Axiological Selection
Mutations are selected based on the Fitness Function from the Axiological Constitution:
1
2
3
| def select_mutation(mutations: List[Mutation], nexus: AxiologicalNexus) -> Mutation:
"""Select mutation that maximizes predicted Value."""
return max(mutations, key=lambda m: nexus.simulate_value(m))
|
3.5 Update Law (Gradient Ascent on Values)
1
| S_{t+1} = S_t + η × ∇_S E[Φ(L(I, S_t + ΔS))]
|
Where:
- η: Learning rate (Plasticity)
- ∇_S: Gradient of Value function with respect to Structure
4. Data Model
4.1 Trauma Signal
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
| trauma_signal:
id: 'trauma-uuid'
timestamp: '2025-12-22T10:00:00Z'
source:
intention_id: 'intention-uuid'
artifact_id: 'artifact-uuid'
magnitude: 0.75 # ||I - O||
threshold: 0.5
triggered: true
category: 'INTELLECTUAL_OE' # Type of overexcitability
|
4.2 Mutation Record
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
| mutation:
id: 'mutation-uuid'
parent_spec_version: 5
proposed_spec_version: 6
type: 'SECONDARY_INTEGRATION'
changes:
- entity: 'SalesNode'
action: 'GENERALIZE'
from: 'Human Salesperson'
to: 'Revenue Node (Human | AI)'
predicted_value: 45.0
status: 'PENDING_APPROVAL'
|
4.3 Disintegration Event
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
| disintegration_event:
id: 'event-uuid'
timestamp: '2025-12-22T10:00:00Z'
level: 'LEVEL_III_SPONTANEOUS_MULTILEVEL'
trigger: 'trauma-uuid'
affected_entities:
- 'SalesNode'
- 'CustomerInteraction'
proposed_mutations:
- 'mutation-uuid-1'
- 'mutation-uuid-2'
sovereign_signature: null # Awaiting human approval
|
5. Execution Flow
sequenceDiagram
participant Sensor as OE Sensors
participant Kernel as Evolutionary Kernel
participant Nexus as Axiological Nexus
participant Spec as Spec Store
participant Sovereign as Human Sovereign
Sensor->>Kernel: Trauma Signal (E > τ)
Kernel->>Kernel: Level II: Disintegration
Kernel->>Kernel: Destruction (Boyd)
Kernel->>Kernel: Generate Mutations
Kernel->>Nexus: Evaluate Mutations (Fitness)
Nexus-->>Kernel: Ranked Mutations
Kernel->>Sovereign: Propose Best Mutation
alt Approved
Sovereign-->>Kernel: Signature
Kernel->>Spec: Apply Mutation
Kernel->>Kernel: Level V: Secondary Integration
else Rejected
Sovereign-->>Kernel: Rejection + Guidance
Kernel->>Kernel: Generate Alternative Mutations
end
6. API Contract
6.1 Report Trauma
Request:
1
2
3
4
5
6
| {
"intention_id": "uuid",
"artifact_id": "uuid",
"observed_vector": [0.1, 0.9, 0.3],
"expected_vector": [0.8, 0.2, 0.5]
}
|
Response:
1
2
3
4
5
6
| {
"trauma_id": "uuid",
"magnitude": 0.75,
"triggered": true,
"disintegration_level": "LEVEL_III"
}
|
6.2 Propose Mutations
1
| GET /kernel/mutations/{trauma_id}
|
Response:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
| {
"mutations": [
{
"id": "uuid",
"predicted_value": 45.0,
"changes_summary": "Generalize SalesNode to Revenue Node",
"confidence": 0.85
}
]
}
|
6.3 Apply Mutation
1
| POST /kernel/mutations/{mutation_id}/apply
|
Request:
1
2
3
4
| {
"sovereign_signature": "base64-encoded-signature",
"approval_reason": "Aligns with Leverage > Automation principle"
}
|
Response:
1
2
3
4
| {
"new_spec_version": 6,
"status": "SECONDARY_INTEGRATION_COMPLETE"
}
|
7. Self-Grooming Protocol
The Kernel continuously monitors for Spec Debt—areas where the current ontology creates friction.
7.1 Backlog as Disintegration Queue
Instead of “features to build,” the backlog is a list of Disintegration Events:
- Where is the system suffering from Psychomotor OE (performance)?
- Where is Emotional OE (user frustration)?
- Where is Intellectual OE (logical contradictions)?
7.2 Attractor State Spec
The Spec is a Strange Attractor, pulling the organization toward the ideal:
- Define the “Personality Ideal” (e.g., “Zero-Touch Fulfillment”)
- The system iteratively disintegrates every process that diverges
8. Integration Points
| Component |
Relationship |
| Axiological Constitution |
Provides Fitness Function for mutation selection |
| Isomorphic Compiler |
Mutation affects Spec used by Compiler |
| Thermodynamic Substrate |
Mutation must fit within energy budget |
| Knowledge Graph |
Context for analogical transfer |
ADRs
PRDs
Other SDS
References