SDS-023: Evolutionary Kernel Service

Status: Draft
Version: 1.0
Date: 2025-12-30
Satisfies: PRD-005, ADR-025
Bounded-Context: shared


0. Isomorphism Declaration

Spec Section SEA-DSL Target Cardinality Verification
2.1 TPD Levels State machine nodes 1:1 Level names match
3.2 Trauma Detect Invariant expression 1:1 Equation matches
4.1 Trauma Signal Entity schema 1:1 Field names + types match
4.2 Mutation Record Entity schema 1:1 Field names + types match
6. API Contract Flow @command/@query 1:1 Input/output schema identical

0.1 Domain Glossary

Term Definition Type Canonical?
Trauma Signal Detected anomaly where observed outcome diverges from intention Entity
Mutation Proposed change to Spec derived from trauma analysis Entity
Disintegration Level Stage in Dabrowski’s TPD model (I-V) Value Object
Overexcitability (OE) High sensitivity sensor for anomaly detection Concept
Secondary Integration Final TPD level where system operates effortlessly at new capacity State
Sovereign Signature Human approval required for high-stakes mutations Value Object
Analogical Transfer Pattern application from other domains during mutation generation Algorithm

1. System Overview

The Evolutionary Kernel Service is the Will of the Cognitive Architecture. It applies Positive Disintegration (Dabrowski) and Destruction/Creation (Boyd) to enable system adaptation without collapse.

It serves as:


2. Theoretical Foundation

2.1 Dabrowski’s Theory of Positive Disintegration (TPD)

The system treats “errors” not as bugs, but as Psychoneuroses—signals that the current Spec is insufficient and must evolve.

Dabrowski Level System State Boyd Action Workflow Status
Level I: Primary Integration Rigid Spec. Works for known inputs. Observe Case_Routine
Level II: Unilevel Disintegration Anomaly occurs. Logic Gates flicker. Orient (Mismatch) Case_Exception
Level III: Spontaneous Multilevel Architect realizes Spec is obsolete. Destruction System_Pause
Level IV: Organized Multilevel Sovereign directs rewrite. Creation Spec_Update
Level V: Secondary Integration Operates effortlessly at new level. Act Case_Routine (New)

2.2 Boyd’s OODA Loop (Destruction/Creation)


3. Core Mechanisms

3.1 Overexcitability Sensors

The system is tuned to High Sensitivity for anomaly detection.

Sensor Type Description Trigger
Intellectual OE Obsessive tracking of logical contradictions Invariant violation
Emotional OE User frustration signals NPS drop, support tickets
Psychomotor OE Performance degradation Latency spikes, errors
Imaginational OE Market signals that contradict worldview Competitor moves
Sensual OE User experience friction UI/UX complaints

3.2 Trauma Detection

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
def detect_trauma(intention: Intention, outcome: Artifact, threshold: float) -> bool:
    """
    E_t = ||I_t - Observed(A_t)||
    If E_t > τ, trigger disintegration.
    """
    trauma = np.linalg.norm(intention.vector - outcome.vector)
    return trauma > threshold

3.3 Mutation Generation

When Trauma is detected, the Kernel generates candidate mutations:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
def generate_mutations(spec: Spec, trauma_signal: TraumaSignal) -> List[Mutation]:
    mutations = []

    # Destruction: Break down current Spec
    entities = spec.decompose()

    # Analogical Synthesis: Apply patterns from other domains
    for entity in entities:
        mutations.extend(analogical_transfer(entity, trauma_signal))

    # Creation: Propose new structures
    mutations.append(synthesize_new_structure(trauma_signal))

    return mutations

3.4 Axiological Selection

Mutations are selected based on the Fitness Function from the Axiological Constitution:

1
2
3
def select_mutation(mutations: List[Mutation], nexus: AxiologicalNexus) -> Mutation:
    """Select mutation that maximizes predicted Value."""
    return max(mutations, key=lambda m: nexus.simulate_value(m))

3.5 Update Law (Gradient Ascent on Values)

1
S_{t+1} = S_t + η × ∇_S E[Φ(L(I, S_t + ΔS))]

Where:


4. Data Model

4.1 Trauma Signal

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
trauma_signal:
  id: 'trauma-uuid'
  timestamp: '2025-12-22T10:00:00Z'
  source:
    intention_id: 'intention-uuid'
    artifact_id: 'artifact-uuid'
  magnitude: 0.75 # ||I - O||
  threshold: 0.5
  triggered: true
  category: 'INTELLECTUAL_OE' # Type of overexcitability

4.2 Mutation Record

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
mutation:
  id: 'mutation-uuid'
  parent_spec_version: 5
  proposed_spec_version: 6
  type: 'SECONDARY_INTEGRATION'
  changes:
    - entity: 'SalesNode'
      action: 'GENERALIZE'
      from: 'Human Salesperson'
      to: 'Revenue Node (Human | AI)'
  predicted_value: 45.0
  status: 'PENDING_APPROVAL'

4.3 Disintegration Event

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
disintegration_event:
  id: 'event-uuid'
  timestamp: '2025-12-22T10:00:00Z'
  level: 'LEVEL_III_SPONTANEOUS_MULTILEVEL'
  trigger: 'trauma-uuid'
  affected_entities:
    - 'SalesNode'
    - 'CustomerInteraction'
  proposed_mutations:
    - 'mutation-uuid-1'
    - 'mutation-uuid-2'
  sovereign_signature: null # Awaiting human approval

5. Execution Flow

sequenceDiagram
    participant Sensor as OE Sensors
    participant Kernel as Evolutionary Kernel
    participant Nexus as Axiological Nexus
    participant Spec as Spec Store
    participant Sovereign as Human Sovereign

    Sensor->>Kernel: Trauma Signal (E > τ)
    Kernel->>Kernel: Level II: Disintegration
    Kernel->>Kernel: Destruction (Boyd)
    Kernel->>Kernel: Generate Mutations
    Kernel->>Nexus: Evaluate Mutations (Fitness)
    Nexus-->>Kernel: Ranked Mutations
    Kernel->>Sovereign: Propose Best Mutation
    alt Approved
        Sovereign-->>Kernel: Signature
        Kernel->>Spec: Apply Mutation
        Kernel->>Kernel: Level V: Secondary Integration
    else Rejected
        Sovereign-->>Kernel: Rejection + Guidance
        Kernel->>Kernel: Generate Alternative Mutations
    end

6. API Contract

6.1 Report Trauma

1
POST /kernel/trauma

Request:

1
2
3
4
5
6
{
  "intention_id": "uuid",
  "artifact_id": "uuid",
  "observed_vector": [0.1, 0.9, 0.3],
  "expected_vector": [0.8, 0.2, 0.5]
}

Response:

1
2
3
4
5
6
{
  "trauma_id": "uuid",
  "magnitude": 0.75,
  "triggered": true,
  "disintegration_level": "LEVEL_III"
}

6.2 Propose Mutations

1
GET /kernel/mutations/{trauma_id}

Response:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
{
  "mutations": [
    {
      "id": "uuid",
      "predicted_value": 45.0,
      "changes_summary": "Generalize SalesNode to Revenue Node",
      "confidence": 0.85
    }
  ]
}

6.3 Apply Mutation

1
POST /kernel/mutations/{mutation_id}/apply

Request:

1
2
3
4
{
  "sovereign_signature": "base64-encoded-signature",
  "approval_reason": "Aligns with Leverage > Automation principle"
}

Response:

1
2
3
4
{
  "new_spec_version": 6,
  "status": "SECONDARY_INTEGRATION_COMPLETE"
}

7. Self-Grooming Protocol

The Kernel continuously monitors for Spec Debt—areas where the current ontology creates friction.

7.1 Backlog as Disintegration Queue

Instead of “features to build,” the backlog is a list of Disintegration Events:

7.2 Attractor State Spec

The Spec is a Strange Attractor, pulling the organization toward the ideal:


8. Integration Points

Component Relationship
Axiological Constitution Provides Fitness Function for mutation selection
Isomorphic Compiler Mutation affects Spec used by Compiler
Thermodynamic Substrate Mutation must fit within energy budget
Knowledge Graph Context for analogical transfer

ADRs

PRDs

Other SDS

References